fbpx

A Workers’ Late Notice of the Employer’s Uninsured Status Limits Both Medical and Wage Loss Benefits

By: Sandra Weigel Kokal

In a recent Commonwealth Court Case, the Court held that if an injured worker fails to notify the Uninsured Employers Guaranty Fund (Fund) within 45 days after the injured worker knows that the employer does not have workerscompensation insurance, the Fund is NOT obligated to provide compensationfrom the date of the injury, but rather from the date the Fund received notice of the claim. The Court stated that compensationincludes both wage loss benefits and medical benefits.

In this recent case, the WorkersCompensation Judge (WCJ) had granted the injured workers Claim Petition against the Fund for both wage loss and medical benefits from the date of the worker’s injury. The employer appealed the WCJs decision to the WorkersCompensation Appeal Board (WCAB). The WCAB agreed with the WCJs decision to grant medical benefits from the time of the workers injury, but it limited the workers receipt of wage loss benefits to the date that the worker had notified the Fund of the employers lack of workerscompensation insurance.

The Commonwealth Court reversed both the WCJ and WCAB decisions. The Commonwealth Court stated, in accordance with a recent PA Supreme Court decision, because the injured worker did not give notice pursuant to the WorkersCompensation Act within 45 days after he knew the employer was uninsured, he could only receive workerscompensation benefits for wage loss AND medical expenses incurred after the date notice was given to the Fund. In other words, because the workers notification to the Fund was late, the Fund was NOT required to pay for medical or wage loss benefits prior to receiving formal notice of the claim.

As this case demonstrates, you should consult with an experienced workers’ compensation attorney so you do not miss any important notice requirements and forfeit your workerscompensation benefits.

Convicted killer’s family files lawsuit against KDOC, other agencies

Today’s post was shared by The Workers’ Injury Law & Advocacy Group and comes from cjonline.com

ann.bush@cjonline.com

It has been nearly two years since convicted killer Roger Hollister died in prison — a death his wife and inmates say occurred because of negligent conduct by several agencies.

Topeka attorney Richard Benson on Monday afternoon filed a civil lawsuit on behalf of Rebecca Hollister, the wife of Roger Hollister, against the Kansas Department of Corrections, Correct Care Solutions, the Kansas Bureau of Investigation, the Nemaha County Attorney’s Office and the Atchison County Sheriff’s Office.

Correct Care Solutions, based in Nashville, Tenn., had a contract with KDOC to handle correctional health care at the El Dorado Correctional Facility, where Hollister was incarcerated.

Roger Hollister, 61, was serving a life sentence for the murder of Patricia Kimmi, 58. Hollister died shortly after noon March 20, 2013, in El Dorado.

Benson filed the lawsuit in Shawnee County District Court shortly before 4 p.m.

“Through this filing, Mrs. Hollister and the late Mr. Hollister turn to the civil justice system to invoke the courts’ protection against arbitrary government action,” Benson said Monday. “That protection is for everyone. The work of the courts in the civil justice system does not make the courts and judiciary a public service. It does, however, serve the public and the rule of law in a way that transcends private interests.”

Other lawsuits

Several lawsuits have stemmed from the death of Patricia Kimmi.

In July…

[Click here to see the rest of this post]

TALK WITH AN ATTORNEY TODAY!

We only get paid when you win, so you don’t have to worry about hourly rates or fees. That means you’ll never see a bill unless you win. Fill out the form below and you’ll hear back from us immediately.