fbpx

Lawsuit filed against Park Kitchen for alleged underpayment of employees

Today’s post was shared by The Workers’ Injury Law & Advocacy Group and comes from www.oregonlive.com

Park Kitchen in Northwest Portland. (Thomas Boyd/The Oregonian)

A lawsuit was filed in Multnomah County Circuit Court June 23 against Park Kitchen for allegedly underpaying its employees starting in 2011. The suit was filed by two former employees.

The lawsuit says that employees were paid below the statutory minimum wage for several years, that the restaurant improperly deducted the employer’s share of Oregon Workers’ Benefit Fund assessments and Social Security and Medicare taxes, and wrongfully pooled and divided tips among non-traditionally tipped employees.

Chef/owner Scott Dolich did not respond to several attempts for comment.

— Samantha Bakall  Follow @sambakall

[Click here to see the rest of this post]

Husband files wrongful death lawsuit against Lexington strip club, its owners and others

Today’s post was shared by The Workers’ Injury Law & Advocacy Group and comes from www.kentucky.com

The husband of a Lexington woman who died last year at Fillies Gentleman’s Club has filed a wrongful death lawsuit against the club, its owners and the man accused of sexually assaulting her before her death.

The lawsuit, filed earlier this month by Joseph Ollie Smiley, widower of Melissa Kline-Smiley, says the gentleman’s club owners — Manfred Jaschkowitz, Larry Windle Oliver and Kimberly Pulliam — allowed Kline-Smiley to be assaulted and they failed to stop the incident from happening.

Club owners did not respond to calls for comment. According to signs at Fillies, located on 987 Winchester Road, the gentleman’s club is under new management and its name has been changed to Diamonds.

Kline-Smiley, 37, and Clyde Wesley Sexton, 71, were painting on July 25, 2013 at Fillies Gentleman’s Club on Winchester Road when Kline-Smiley passed out. Police have said Sexton performed sexual acts on her rather than calling for help. The lawsuit says Sexton’s “wrongful” and “unlawful outrageous conduct lasted until he was sexually gratified.”

It took 20 to 30 minutes for Kline-Smiley, who was still unconscious, to receive assistance. She was placed on life support at University of Kentucky Chandler Hospital and died July 29.

The lawsuit says the owners “were aware of the deceased’s condition that resulted in her passing out at certain times and required immediate medical attention to save her life.” The lawsuit continues that the owners “knew or…

[Click here to see the rest of this post]

Dealing with Panel Doctors

Many employers set up so-called panels of medical providers to treat injured workers for work related injuries. Under the new Pennsylvania Worker’s Compensation act if an employer sets up a list of at least six healthcare providers the injured worker has to treat with a provider on that list for the first 90 days of treatment. If the worker treats with someone not on the list, it would be at his/her expense. The 90 days begins to run with the first day of treatment and ends on the 90th calendar day from that point.

Many employers attempt to direct the injured worker to a specific medical provider. This can be an occupational medicine doctor that the employer sends everyone to or it could be the occupational medicine Department of local hospital. Needless to say, these referrals are very important to the physician or facility to which the injured worker is being steered. The injured worker has every right to question exactly where the loyalty of such providers actually lies. Every injured worker has the right to pick any doctor on the list with whom to treat, regardless of the preferences of the employer. Of course, if the injured worker has a back problem he cannot treat with the eye doctor on the list. So long as the physician treats the kind of problem the injured worker has, the worker can choose to see that physician. Workers should firmly but politely exercise their right to see the doctor on their list of their choosing. When in doubt about what one is able to do, injured workers should always consult a knowledgeable workers compensation attorney.

Sometimes during the 90 day surgery is recommended by one of the panel doctors. The best approach to dealing with this situation would be to wait until after the 90 days has expired, so that the injured worker can see a surgeon of his or her own choosing. The Worker’s Compensation act clearly provides that a workers compensation claimant can see any physician here she chooses after the 90 days. Our firm often recommends to our clients that he or she make an appointment with their own physician for the 91st day so as to begin the process as soon as possible.

Our Worker’s Compensation attorneys often see appointments made for injured workers near the end of the 90 day. We see panel doctors frequently releasing injured workers to full duty and/or certifying full recovery as the workers approach the 90 day deadline. The safer course for injured workers who already have an appointment scheduled after the 90th day is to avoid an examination with the panel doctor close to the 90 day deadline.

 If you, the reader, is looking for a workers compensation attorney in Pennsylvania, please feel free to call us. You will receive a no charge and no obligation consultation.

Prison medical care lawsuit: Inmate’s mother says just treat them ‘like humans’

Today’s post was shared by The Workers’ Injury Law & Advocacy Group and comes from www.al.com

Reesa Gentle of Scottsboro speaks about her son, a state inmate at St. Clair Correctional Facility, during a news conference in Montgomery, Ala., on July 17, 2014. Gentle’s son, Joshua Dunn, is a plaintiff in a lawsuit alleging unconstitutionally poor medical and mental health care in Alabama’s prisons. (Mike Cason/mcason@al.com)

MONTGOMERY, Alabama — Reesa Gentle of Scottsboro says she lies awake at night wondering if her son is safe.

Her son, Joshua Dunn, is a plaintiff in a lawsuit that alleges the Alabama Department of Corrections does such a poor job at providing medical care for state inmates that it constitutes cruel and unusual punishment.

“We just want them to be treated like humans. Don’t throw them away and try to hide them,” Gentle said at a Montgomery news conference to announce the lawsuit.

“If I could do the time for him, I would,” she said.

Dunn is one of 40 inmates named as plaintiffs in the 120-page complaint filed by lawyers from the Southern Poverty Law Center and the Alabama Disabilities Advocacy Program. The plaintiffs asked the court to make the case a class action lawsuit, so that they can represent all current and future prisoners.

The lawsuit claims the Department of Corrections fails to provide a constitutionally required level of medical and mental health care and violates federal laws requiring accommodations for disabled prisoners.

DOC Commissioner Kim Thomas issued a statement saying that DOC believes many…

[Click here to see the rest of this post]

Montana Indian voting lawsuit settled

Today’s post was shared by The Workers’ Injury Law & Advocacy Group and comes from www.greatfallstribune.com

HELENA – Indian plaintiffs who sued in federal court to force the Montana secretary of state and three rural counties to open satellite voting offices on remote reservations have settled the lawsuit out of court.

Under the agreement, the three counties agree to open satellite voting locations on three reservations and pay plaintiffs’ attorney fees in the amount of $75,000. In a separate agreement, the state agrees to pay an additional $25,000 in attorney fees, according to Secretary of State Linda McCulloch.

“I pledged to help assist the tribes and the counties to make this all work,” McCulloch said.

Both sides hailed the agreement as a win.

Northern Cheyenne tribal member Mark Wandering Medicine, along with 11 other Indian plaintiffs, in February 2013 sued McCulloch and county elections officials in Blaine, Rosebud and Big Horn counties, alleging the defendants violated portions of the federal Voting Rights Act, which “prohibit voting practices or procedures that discriminate on the basis of race, color or membership in one of the language minority groups.”

The plaintiffs argued their rights to equal access to voting were violated when McCulloch and county elections officials refused to set up satellite voting offices on remote Indian reservations in advance of the November 2012 presidential election.

The U.S. Department of Justice’s Civil Rights Division, the ACLU of Montana and the national ACLU Voting…

[Click here to see the rest of this post]

Waffle House chairman claims extortion plot in lawsuit

Today’s post was shared by The Workers’ Injury Law & Advocacy Group and comes from www.ajc.com

Waffle House Chairman of the Board Joe Rogers Jr. says in a lawsuit that three attorneys hired by his ex-housekeeper used extortion as a means to force him to settle the woman’s sexual harassment claims.

The lawsuit filed in Cobb County Superior Court is the latest legal action involving Rogers and one of his former employees, Mye Brindle, who served as Rogers’ housekeeper and then personal assistant from May 2003 until June 2012. Rogers has admitted in court filings to having “infrequent consensual sexual encounters” with Brindle. However, he denies engaging in sexual harassment and claims the woman initially sued as an attempt to extort money.

In his suit filed May 30, Rogers accuses attorneys David Cohen, Hylton Dupree and John Butters of scheming with Brindle to illegally obtain evidence, file false police reports and force Rogers to meet their demands. The attorneys deny the allegations.

“Mr. Rogers’ baseless allegations are an act of desperation,” Dupree told The Atlanta Journal-Constitution. “We will respond in court at the appropriate time.”

Earlier this year, Rogers filed complaints with the State Bar of Georgia against Cohen and Butters, according to documents obtained by The AJC. But the Bar found no violation of the state’s ethics rules and the grievances were dismissed.

In June 2012, Brindle hired the three attorneys to represent her. According to the lawsuit, it was the three attorneys that…

[Click here to see the rest of this post]

TALK WITH AN ATTORNEY TODAY!

We only get paid when you win, so you don’t have to worry about hourly rates or fees. That means you’ll never see a bill unless you win. Fill out the form below and you’ll hear back from us immediately.