News

April 23, 2015

Today’s post was shared by The Workers’ Injury Law & Advocacy Group and comes from gazette.com

Advertisement

A lawsuit alleging that Memorial Hospital employees were forced from a lucrative pension program failed to prove Colorado Springs officials did anything wrong, city attorneys argued in a motion filed this week.

The motion – which sought to dismiss the lawsuit – marked the city’s first response since the case was moved to federal district court in late 2013.

Two former Memorial Hospital employees, Margarethe Bench and Kathryn Romstad, claim the city did not follow the proper procedures for pulling roughly 4,000 hospital employees out of the Public Employees’ Retirement Association on Oct. 1, 2012, when the city began leasing the hospital to University of Colorado Health.

For example, they claim the city did not allow employees to vote on whether they wanted to leave the state’s pension fund, according to court documents.

In a motion filed by the city Tuesday, attorneys asked the suit be tossed because no contract explicitly stated the employees would be a part of PERA forever.

Despite citing the employees handbook and other resources, “the factual allegations do not plausibly support the existence of a contract for future PERA participation after the City ceased to employ Plaintiffs,” the motion said.

UCHealth’s pension plan is inferior to the one offered by PERA, the lawsuit alleged. And pediatric division employees now employed by Children’s Hospital Colorado were offered an employee-contribution retirement plan that amounted to “tens of thousands,…

[Click here to see the rest of this post]